c5c6fea75a Greenpeace, for example, has said, "The benefits of the U.N. military operations on the high seas could be inhibited when states merely "feel" threatened by them. One of the concerns raised by critics of the Law of the Sea Treaty is that it could be used to sharply limit U.S. Such provisions were among the reasons President Ronald Reagan rejected the treaty in 1982. accession to the treaty in a unanimous vote in March 2004. The energy and mining sectors believe the treaty will help move deep sea mining and oil exploration forward by establishing internationally-recognized title to minerals.34 . Ridenour .
When the energy industry and environmentalists agree on an issue, one of the two likely doesn't fully comprehend the implications. defense operations on the high seas.22 . No single nation or region can do this alone: it will require comprehensive international cooperation as required by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea."39 . The Law of the Sea Treaty calls for technology transfers and wealth transfers from developed to undeveloped nations.4 It also requires parties to the treaty to adopt regulations and laws to control pollution of the marine environment. Detention of ships in a manner other than those prescribed in the treaty would subject such actions to the judgment of the International Tribunal of the Law of the Sea in Hamburg, Germany. 01 June 2016 First appeared online: 1981 Back to top You are not logged in Username Password Athens users log in here Log in via your institution Give us your feedback Full Access No Access(payment required) Open Access Brill Online for. 2 David B.
Keilehas replied
487 weeks ago